TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court directs State to confirm vacancies for Commercial Tax Inspector, with seniority from specific date.</h1> <h3>ROMA SONKAR Versus MADHYA PRADESH STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR.</h3> ROMA SONKAR Versus MADHYA PRADESH STATE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR. - TMI Issues:1. Benefit of certain answers not awarded in a competitive examination.2. Consequential benefits on appointment and seniority granted by Single Judge.3. Challenge by State Public Service Commission before Division Bench.4. Division Bench remitting the matter to Single Judge for relief.5. Jurisdiction of Division Bench in an intra court appeal.6. Consideration of appeal on merits by Division Bench.7. Appointment of appellant as Commercial Tax Inspector.8. Seniority entitlement of the appellant.9. Disposal of pending applications.10. Costs.Analysis:The appellant participated in a competitive examination in 2010 and sought benefit for answers not awarded, discovered through an RTI application. The Single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh granted consequential benefits on appointment and seniority, a decision challenged by the State Public Service Commission before the Division Bench. The Division Bench, while agreeing in principle with the process, was dissatisfied with the relief granted by the Single Judge and remitted the matter back to the Single Judge for reconsideration of the relief. The Supreme Court expressed reservations on the Division Bench's authority to remit a writ petition regarding relief molding, emphasizing that the Single Judge and Division Bench exercise the same jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Division Bench's role in an intra court appeal is primarily to assess the correctness of the Single Judge's judgment rather than remitting the matter back to the Single Judge.Upon review, the Supreme Court directed the State of Madhya Pradesh to confirm the availability of vacancies for the post of Commercial Tax Inspector. The State highlighted potential issues with the appellant's appointment affecting the seniority of existing officers and deferred the decision to the State Public Service Commission regarding the appellant's potential success if awarded the benefit of marks. In the interest of justice, the Supreme Court ordered the appellant's appointment as a Commercial Tax Inspector without setting a precedent, clarifying that seniority would commence from a specific date to avoid future disputes. The appointment was mandated within four weeks; failure to comply would result in the appellant being deemed appointed from a later date.The appeals were disposed of, pending applications were resolved, and no costs were awarded in the judgment. The detailed analysis addressed the issues of benefit entitlement, relief molding by the Single Judge, jurisdiction of the Division Bench, appointment as Commercial Tax Inspector, seniority entitlement, and the overall disposal of the case without costs.
TaxTMI 