TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether demand of duty under Rule 223A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is governed by the limitation and recovery machinery of Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 223A operates in a distinct field. It deals with stock verification in a factory, warehouse, or approved storeroom and permits duty demand on deficiency in stock not satisfactorily explained, together with a separate penalty. Section 11A, by contrast, applies to cases of non-levy, short-levy, non-payment, short-payment, or erroneous refund and contains its own concept of relevant date and limitation. The reasoning treats the two provisions as serving different objects, with Rule 223A concerned with non-accountal of goods and Section 11A concerned with recovery of duty in short-levy situations. The limitation under Section 11A therefore cannot be imported into Rule 223A proceedings.
Conclusion: Demand under Rule 223A is not governed by Section 11A.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the revenue position on the legal question, while the main appeal was left for consideration on merits by the referring Bench.
Ratio Decidendi: A special rule creating an independent liability for deficiency in accounted stock is not subject to the limitation regime attached to the general recovery provision for non-levy or short-levy of duty.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
