Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (10) TMI 1358 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Allows Business Loss & Deduction for Bad Debts, Upholds Compensation Payment & Additional Depreciation Claims The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the entire amount of Rs.1,02,00,000/- as a business loss and grant deduction for bad debts written ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Allows Business Loss & Deduction for Bad Debts, Upholds Compensation Payment & Additional Depreciation Claims

                          The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the entire amount of Rs.1,02,00,000/- as a business loss and grant deduction for bad debts written off, provided the debt is reflected in the books of accounts. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to allow the entire compensation payment of Rs.65,00,000/- as a deductible expense under section 37 of the Act. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the bad debt claim related to advances made to M/s. Soprano Holdings Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to permit the claim for additional depreciation on second-hand windmills.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of bad debts under section 35D of the Act.
                          2. Disallowance of compensation payment for delayed commissioning of windmills.
                          3. Claim of bad debt in respect of advances made to M/s. Soprano Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
                          4. Disallowance of bad debts written off for land advance given to M/s. Wipro Finance Ltd.
                          5. Addition of rupee fluctuation loss on foreign currency convertible bonds.
                          6. Additional depreciation claimed by the assessee.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Disallowance of Bad Debts under Section 35D of the Act
                          - Facts: The assessee claimed bad debts of Rs.1,02,00,000/- for advances made to M/s. Cicon Environmental Technologies Ltd. for a project that was abandoned.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the claim, treating the expenditure as preliminary expenses under section 35D, which can only be amortized upon successful commissioning of the project.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Allowed 1/5th of the expenses (Rs.20,40,000/-) to be written off per year starting from the year the project was abandoned.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Directed the Assessing Officer to treat the entire amount of Rs.1,02,00,000/- as business loss and grant deduction, provided the debt is written off in the books of accounts.

                          Issue 2: Disallowance of Compensation Payment for Delayed Commissioning of Windmills
                          - Facts: The assessee paid Rs.65,00,000/- to M/s. Indonet Global Ltd. as compensation for delayed commissioning of windmills.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the entire claim due to lack of substantiation.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Allowed Rs.22,04,432/- as interest payment but disallowed the balance.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the entire Rs.65,00,000/- as a deductible expense under section 37 of the Act.

                          Issue 3: Claim of Bad Debt in Respect of Advances Made to M/s. Soprano Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
                          - Facts: The assessee claimed bad debts of Rs.2,00,00,000/- for advances made to M/s. Soprano Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the claim as the debt was not related to any revenue transaction or incidental to the business.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Allowed the claim following the Tribunal's decision for the assessment year 2004-05.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the bad debt claim.

                          Issue 4: Disallowance of Bad Debts Written Off for Land Advance Given to M/s. Wipro Finance Ltd.
                          - Facts: The assessee claimed a loss of Rs.1,47,00,000/- for an advance given for land purchase that was not materialized.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the claim as the loss had not crystallized during the relevant assessment year.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Confirmed the disallowance, stating the advance was not a regular business asset.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim as business loss.

                          Issue 5: Addition of Rupee Fluctuation Loss on Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds
                          - Facts: The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs.4,78,44,777/- for rupee fluctuation loss on foreign currency convertible bonds.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the claim as the loss was notional and contingent.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Held that the loss can only be allowed in the year of actual redemption/conversion.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim provided section 43A of the Act is not applicable.

                          Issue 6: Additional Depreciation Claimed by the Assessee
                          - Facts: The assessee claimed additional depreciation of Rs.3,02,62,222/- on second-hand windmills.
                          - Assessing Officer's View: Disallowed the excess claim of depreciation while computing book profit under section 115JB of the Act.
                          - Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) Decision: Allowed the claim, stating that higher depreciation is permissible under the Companies Act and the Assessing Officer cannot make adjustments other than those specified in the Act.
                          - Tribunal's Decision: Upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, allowing the additional depreciation claim.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The appeals in ITA Nos.936 & 937/Mds/2015 of the assessee were allowed.
                          - ITA No.1823/Mds/2015 of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
                          - ITA No.1824/Mds/2015 of the Revenue was dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found