Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age Alignment for Private College Teachers

The Supreme Court held that the Coordination Committee's decision to align the retirement age of private college Teachers with Government college staff was binding. The Court directed the Madhya Pradesh Government to pay salaries to Teachers in private aided colleges who worked until the enhanced retirement age of 65 years. The High Court's decision was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the Teachers.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Entitlement of Teachers in private aided educational institutions in Madhya Pradesh to the benefit of enhanced age of superannuation of 65 years.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Background and Appointment:
The appellant was appointed as a Lecturer in Commerce (later Assistant Professor) on 01.09.1979 at an affiliated college receiving 100% grant-in-aid from the State Government.

2. Legislative Amendments and Recommendations:
On 02.09.1998, the Madhya Pradesh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki Ayu) Second Amendment Act, 1998, increased the retirement age of Government Teachers from 60 to 62 years, extending this benefit to Teachers in private aided colleges. On 01.04.2003, the Standing Committee recommended that the retirement age of private college staff should be aligned with Government college staff, a recommendation approved by the Coordination Committee on 07.01.2004.

3. 2008 Scheme and UGC Regulations:
The Ministry of Human Resources Development introduced a pay revision scheme on 31.12.2008, which included increasing the retirement age to 65 years. The Madhya Pradesh Government accepted this on 16.04.2010 for Government college staff. The UGC Regulations, 2010, framed under Section 26 (1) (d) (e) of the UGC Act, 1956, fixed the retirement age at 65 years. On 02.05.2011, the Madhya Pradesh Government amended the relevant provisions to extend the retirement age to 65 years for Government college Teachers.

4. Legal Disputes and Court Orders:
The withdrawal of grant-in-aid for salaries of Teachers in 100% aided private institutes was contested and resolved by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.71 of 2004. The Court directed the extension of 6th Pay Commission scales to private aided educational institute staff, effective from 01.01.2006.

5. High Court Proceedings:
The appellant challenged the management's order retiring him at 62 years by filing a Writ Petition, which was dismissed. The Division Bench referred two questions to a Larger Bench regarding the applicability of enhanced retirement age to private institute Teachers. The Full Bench concluded that Statute 28 was not amended as it was merely a recommendation and that UGC Regulations, 2010, were not automatically applicable to the State Government.

6. Supreme Court's Analysis:
The Supreme Court analyzed Section 36 of the 1973 Adhiniyam, emphasizing the Coordination Committee's power to prepare, amend, and repeal Statutes independently. The Court found that the High Court's interpretation requiring Executive Council approval for amendments initiated by the Coordination Committee was erroneous. The Supreme Court noted that the recommendation to align the retirement age was indeed implemented by amending Statute 28 of the College Code.

7. Conclusion and Directions:
The Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court's conclusion that the Coordination Committee's resolution was merely a recommendation and that UGC Regulations required State Government adoption. The Court held that the Coordination Committee's decision was binding and directed the Madhya Pradesh Government to pay salaries to Teachers in aided private colleges who worked till the enhanced retirement age of 65 years.

Judgment:
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgments and allowed the appeals, directing the Madhya Pradesh Government to implement the enhanced retirement age and pay the corresponding salaries.

---