TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>State PSU Denied ITC for Developing Industrial Area: Construction vs. Input Services</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited,</h3> In Re: M/s. Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited, - TMI Issues Involved:1. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on input services of construction or works contract for development and special maintenance of an industrial area.2. Mechanism for apportionment of ITC between exempt and taxable supplies.Detailed Analysis:1. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC):Applicant's Submission:- The applicant, a Rajasthan State Government-owned Public Sector Undertaking, develops and leases industrial and non-industrial plots.- The development involves significant civil work and infrastructure setup, which is charged as revenue expenditure in the profit and loss account.- The applicant argues that ITC should be available on GST paid for these development and maintenance activities since these are part of the cost of stock and not capitalized as immovable property.- They cite Section 16 of the CGST Act, which allows ITC on goods or services used in the course of business, and argue that Section 17(5)(c) and (d) restrictions do not apply as the expenses are not capitalized.Jurisdictional Officer's Comments:- The officer contends that ITC is not allowed under Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act, which blocks credit on works contract services and goods/services used for construction of immovable property unless it is for further supply of works contract service.- The officer concludes that the applicant is not eligible for ITC as the services are not for further supply of works contract service.Authority's Findings:- The authority agrees with the jurisdictional officer, stating that the applicant's development work constitutes construction of immovable property.- Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the CGST Act explicitly disallows ITC on works contract services and goods/services for construction of immovable property, except for plant and machinery.- The authority notes that the applicant's expenses should be capitalized as they enhance the value of the property, thus ITC is not permissible.- The authority does not rely on the Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. case as it is pending before the Supreme Court and has not attained finality.Conclusion on ITC Eligibility:- The applicant cannot claim ITC on the input services of construction or works contract procured for the development and special maintenance of an industrial area.2. Mechanism for Apportionment of ITC:Applicant's Submission:- The applicant seeks guidance on apportioning ITC between exempt and taxable supplies, given that long-term leasing of industrial plots is exempt, while leasing of non-industrial/commercial plots is taxable.- They propose two methods:1. Apportioning based on the aggregate turnover of exempt and taxable supplies during the tax period.2. Apportioning based on the total area of industrial (exempt) and non-industrial (taxable) plots in the developed area.Authority's Findings:- The authority does not address the mechanism for apportionment of ITC as the primary question of ITC eligibility was answered in the negative.Conclusion on Apportionment Mechanism:- As the applicant is not eligible for ITC, the question of apportionment does not arise.Final Ruling:- The applicant cannot claim ITC on the input services of construction or works contract procured for the development of an industrial area or the special maintenance expenses of the area.
TaxTMI 