Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether de-mineralised water cleared from the factory was correctly classifiable under Heading 2851.19, and whether the demand raised on such clearance was sustainable.
Analysis: The goods were found to be extremely pure water used for industrial consumption. The treatment process materially changed the character and application of the water, and the product answered the description of distilled water, conductivity water, or water of similar purity under Heading 2851. Water used captively within the factory was recognized as falling under Heading 2851.11 and attracting nil duty, but the same product when removed from the factory was held to be classifiable under Heading 2851.19 and liable to duty. The assessee did not show that the product escaped the relevant tariff description, nor did it displace the earlier view taken in its own case for an earlier period.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 2851.19 was upheld and the demand was sustained against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: De-mineralised water cleared outside the factory, though captively exempt when used within the factory, is classifiable as distilled water or water of similar purity under Heading 2851.19 and is exigible to duty.