Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST assessment orders could be sustained when no personal hearing was afforded before passing adverse orders under Section 75(4) of the Tamilnadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017.
Analysis: The petitioner had not filed a reply within time or expressly sought personal hearing. Even so, once adverse orders were contemplated, the authority was bound to afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The absence of such opportunity amounted to violation of the principles of natural justice and the statutory safeguard under Section 75(4).
Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after granting reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Where adverse tax orders are proposed, personal hearing must be afforded in conformity with Section 75(4) and the principles of natural justice, even if the assessee has not separately requested such hearing.