Tribunal Decision: Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed, Disallowance under Section 14A Upheld

The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on issues regarding addition towards purchase of movies and deferred revenue expenditure. However, the Tribunal sustained the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D concerning investments in the subsidiary for control purposes. The order was pronounced on November 20, 2018, in Chennai.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition towards purchase of movies, programme production expenses, etc.
2. Deferred revenue expenditure.
3. Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Issue 1 - Addition towards purchase of movies, programme production expenses, etc.:
The Tribunal considered the appeal by the Revenue against the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that a similar issue had been decided in favor of the assessee in previous assessment years. Referring to past Tribunal orders, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to allow the expenditure as revenue expenditure. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) on this issue.

Issue 2 - Deferred revenue expenditure:
The Tribunal examined the issue of deferred revenue expenditure, which had been previously discussed in the assessee's case for earlier assessment years. Citing past Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal found that the monies received were treated as deferred revenue and offered as income when the program was aired. Following the precedent set in the assessee's case, the Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) without finding any reason to interfere.

Issue 3 - Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D:
The Tribunal addressed the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 14A read with Rule 8D concerning expenditure related to exempt income and investments. The Assessing Officer had determined a disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) and (iii), which the CIT(A) directed to restrict based on the assessee's submissions. The Tribunal considered the argument that investments in the subsidiary were not primarily for earning dividend income but for controlling the business. Referring to a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal concluded that such investments in the subsidiary, not for earning dividends but for control purposes, should be subject to disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and sustained the disallowance made under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, pronouncing the order on the 20th of November, 2018 in Chennai.

---