Notice Sufficient for Ex Parte Proceeding; Applicant Directed to File Claim The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient, proceeding ex parte as the Corporate Debtor did not appear. The Applicant was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Notice Sufficient for Ex Parte Proceeding; Applicant Directed to File Claim
The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient, proceeding ex parte as the Corporate Debtor did not appear. The Applicant was directed to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) and given liberty to revive the petition if the previous order was challenged or set aside. The application was disposed of accordingly.
The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient as per the order. The Corporate Debtor did not appear, so the case proceeded ex parte. The Applicant was directed to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP). The Applicant was given liberty to revive the petition if the previous order was challenged or set aside. The application was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.