1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Notice Sufficient for Ex Parte Proceeding; Applicant Directed to File Claim</h1> The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient, proceeding ex parte as the Corporate Debtor did not appear. The Applicant was ... Maintainability of petition - Corporate Debtor is proceeded ex parte - Corporate Debtor is already under the CIR process - HELD THAT:- It has been submitted by the Applicant that in the event the order dated 15.01.2018 is challenged/set aside by the higher Courts, then the Applicant will be remediless. Therefore, in the event the order dated 15.01.2018 is challenged/set aside, the Applicant is given liberty to revive the Petition. Application disposed off. The Tribunal found the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor sufficient as per the order. The Corporate Debtor did not appear, so the case proceeded ex parte. The Applicant was directed to file a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP). The Applicant was given liberty to revive the petition if the previous order was challenged or set aside. The application was disposed of accordingly.