Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification order passed without affording an opportunity of hearing was liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The rectification application had been disposed of without notice to the petitioner or an opportunity of being heard. A decision affecting the petitioner's rights, especially in rectification proceedings under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, could not be sustained when passed in breach of the audi alteram partem rule. The appropriate course was to set aside the rectification order and direct reconsideration after notice and hearing.
Conclusion: The rectification order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.
Ratio Decidendi: An order passed in rectification proceedings in violation of the principles of natural justice, particularly without notice and hearing, is liable to be set aside and reconsidered afresh.