Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether previous sanction under Section 197(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was necessary to prosecute a public servant for alleged fabrication of records and misappropriation.
Analysis: Section 197(1) protects a public servant only where the alleged offence is committed while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of official duty, that is, where there is a reasonable and integral connection between the act complained of and the performance of public duty. An act of fabricating records or misappropriating funds is not part of official duty, even if the office afforded the opportunity to commit it. The protection of sanction cannot be extended to crimes merely facilitated by official position.
Conclusion: Previous sanction was not required, and the contrary view of the courts below was unsustainable.