TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal orders reassessment under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>Shri Rakesh Kumar Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 1 (C), Jammu & Kashmir</h3> Shri Rakesh Kumar Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 1 (C), Jammu & Kashmir - TMI Issues Involved:1. Validity of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.2. Whether the cessation of liability occurred in the assessment year under consideration.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Validity of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax ActThe assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) which upheld the addition made by the A.O under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The A.O had added Rs. 27,29,325 to the assessee's income, claiming that the liabilities towards M/s Gee Dee Stonex Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Jindal Tiles Pvt. Ltd. had ceased. The CIT(A) supported this addition, noting that the creditors had denied any outstanding balances owed by the assessee. The assessee argued that no benefit was obtained in the year under consideration, hence no addition should be made under Section 41(1). The CIT(A) concluded that the liability ceased when the creditors confirmed no dues, thus justifying the addition under Section 41(1).Issue 2: Whether the cessation of liability occurred in the assessment year under considerationThe Tribunal examined whether the cessation of liability occurred in the assessment year 2013-14. It was noted that the statutory provision under Section 41(1)(a) specifies that the benefit from the cessation of liability should be taxed in the year it was obtained. The Tribunal found no evidence that the benefit was obtained in the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal criticized the lower authorities for not verifying the exact year when the liabilities were written off by the creditors. The Tribunal emphasized that the addition should relate to the year in which the benefit was actually obtained, not merely when the A.O discovered it during assessment proceedings.Conclusion:The Tribunal restored the matter to the A.O for re-adjudication, directing necessary verifications to determine the exact year the liabilities were written off by the creditors and the benefit was obtained by the assessee under Section 41(1). The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the addition of Rs. 27,29,325 was set aside pending fresh adjudication.Order Pronounced:The order was pronounced in the open court on 17.11.2017.
TaxTMI 