TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal adjusts agricultural income, allows brick expenses inquiry, confirms labor charges.</h1> <h3>Shri Kuldipsingh Balvantsingh Sodhi, Prop. of Kamala Electricals Versus The ACIT, Circle-3, Baroda</h3> Shri Kuldipsingh Balvantsingh Sodhi, Prop. of Kamala Electricals Versus The ACIT, Circle-3, Baroda - TMI Issues Involved:1. Reduction of agricultural income.2. Disallowance of brick expenses.3. Disallowance of labor charges.Summary:1. Reduction of Agricultural Income:The first issue concerns the reduction of agricultural income from Rs. 2,95,535/- to Rs. 1,77,323/-. The A.O. observed that the assessee did not furnish proof of agricultural income and expenditure during the assessment proceedings despite multiple opportunities. Consequently, the A.O. treated the entire agricultural income as undisclosed income. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal, reducing the agricultural income by considering 40% of the receipts as expenditure. The Tribunal, after hearing the arguments and considering the evidence, decided that 30% of the receipts should be considered as expenditure and directed the A.O. to re-compute the agricultural income accordingly.2. Disallowance of Brick Expenses:The second issue involves the disallowance of brick expenses amounting to Rs. 5,04,567/-. The A.O. treated the purchases as bogus due to non-response from the suppliers and lack of evidence from the assessee. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, not admitting additional evidence. However, the Tribunal admitted the additional evidence under ITAT Rule 29, noting that the A.O. had recorded statements from the brick suppliers during the remand report. The Tribunal directed the A.O. to make necessary inquiries and take a decision as per law, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order.3. Disallowance of Labor Charges:The third issue pertains to the disallowance of labor charges. The A.O. disallowed Rs. 50,000/- out of Rs. 59,38,958/- due to unverifiable cash payments through self-made vouchers. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to Rs. 30,000/-, considering the nature of the business. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding it reasonable given the circumstances.Conclusion:The assessee's appeal is partly allowed, with directions for re-computation of agricultural income and further inquiry into the brick expenses, while the disallowance of labor charges is confirmed.
TaxTMI 