Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal Upholds Tax Decisions on Stone Bunds & Loans, Dismisses Revenue Appeals</h1> <h3>The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle I (4), Chennai Versus M/s. Jakhau Salt Co. Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle I (4), Chennai Versus M/s. Jakhau Salt Co. Pvt. Ltd. - TMI Issues involved: Appeal against orders of Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) for assessment years 2004-05 and 2007-08.For the assessment year 2004-05:The Revenue appealed against the allowance of depreciation on stone bunds, arguing that stone bunds should not be treated as a separate asset eligible for depreciation at a different rate than salt pans. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that stone bunds are integral to salt pans and should be depreciated at 100% like salt pans. The Tribunal agreed, emphasizing the essential role of stone bunds in operating salt pans and dismissing the Revenue's appeal.For the assessment year 2007-08:The Revenue challenged the deletion of additions made under section 2(22)(e) of the Act for loans received from two companies. Regarding the loan from M/s. Archean Granites Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal held that as the assessee was not a shareholder, section 2(22)(e) did not apply. For the loan from M/s. Goodearth Maritime Ltd., the Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that it was a running account for business transactions and not a loan. Citing relevant case law, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision and dismissed the Revenue's appeal for the assessment year 2007-08.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2007-08, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) in both cases.