TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Invalid Assessment Order Quashed Due to Incorrect Entity Name</h1> <h3>BASF India Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-6 (1), Mumbai</h3> BASF India Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-6 (1), Mumbai - TMI Issues:Challenge to validity of final assessment order due to incorrect entity name.Analysis:The appeal challenges the final assessment order passed under section 143(3) r/w section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2008-09, specifically questioning the validity of the order. The assessee argues that the Assessing Officer erroneously issued the final assessment order in the name of an entity that no longer exists, despite being informed about the amalgamation/merger with another company. The Departmental Representative acknowledges a typographical error in omitting the correct name in the final order but argues that it is a curable defect. The Tribunal notes that the entity named in the final assessment order, BASF Polyurethanes India Ltd., had amalgamated/merged with BASF India Ltd., and ceased to exist as per the approved scheme. Citing legal precedents, including decisions by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Delhi High Court, the Tribunal emphasizes that an order passed in the name of a non-existing entity is invalid. Consequently, the final assessment order is quashed due to being issued against an entity that no longer exists.The Tribunal further rules that since the assessment order is declared invalid, the grounds challenging the additions made in the order are of academic nature and need not be deliberated upon. Any issues raised in these grounds are left for future adjudication if they arise in subsequent assessment years. Additionally, a redundant ground is dismissed. As a result, the appeal is allowed based on the invalidity of the assessment order due to the incorrect entity name, as pronounced in the open court on 19.11.2019.
TaxTMI 