TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Appeal Allowed on Advance Disallowance & Suppressed Sales Addition</h1> <h3>M/s. Bajrang Conveyors Versus The Income Tax Officer, - 2 (1), Bilasopur</h3> M/s. Bajrang Conveyors Versus The Income Tax Officer, - 2 (1), Bilasopur - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of advance received for supply of goods as bogus trading liability.2. Addition of suppressed sales.Issue 1: Disallowance of advance received for supply of goods as bogus trading liability:The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)- Bilaspur for the assessment year 2009-2010. The primary issue was the disallowance of Rs. 27,49,190/- by the lower authorities, treating it as an advance received for the supply of goods and considering it a bogus trading liability. The Assessing Officer observed discrepancies in the account of the party from whom the advance was received. The assessee explained that the advance was for a specific project, and the realization value would be accounted for in the next assessment year. However, the Assessing Officer did not accept this explanation and treated the amount as a bogus liability under section 68 of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld this decision. During the appeal, the assessee presented additional evidence, including an invoice and stock calculation for the relevant financial year. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to provide the assessee with an opportunity to explain the details and verify the sales bills for the assessment year 2010-2011 before passing a fresh order on the issue.Issue 2: Addition of suppressed sales:Another issue in the case was the addition of Rs. 8,60,783/- as suppressed sales. The ITAT, having restored the earlier disallowance issue back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation, also directed the reconsideration of the suppressed sales addition with the same instructions. Consequently, the addition of suppressed sales was also allowed for statistical purposes. Ultimately, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 15/01/2018.
TaxTMI 