Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an investigating police officer can require the attendance of a witness under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 when the witness is not residing within the limits of the police station or any adjoining station.
Analysis: Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 permits a police officer making an investigation to require attendance only of a person who appears acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and who is within the limits of his own police station or any adjoining station. The provision is territorial in its operation and does not authorise a summons to a person residing outside that local area. On the admitted facts, the petitioner was residing at Hyderabad and not within the limits of the concerned police station at Pune or any adjoining station. The direction requiring him to attend at Pune therefore exceeded the statutory power conferred by Section 160.
Conclusion: The summons issued to the petitioner under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was illegal and void, and the writ petition was allowed with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A police officer conducting an investigation under Section 160 can require attendance only of a person who is within the limits of the officer's own or an adjoining police station; a summons issued beyond that territorial limit is without authority of law.