Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate insolvency resolution process period could be extended by excluding the Covid lockdown period, and whether further time beyond 180 days was liable to be granted.
Analysis: The application sought exclusion of the lockdown period from 23 March 2020 to 31 August 2020 while the 180-day CIRP period was nearing expiry. The Tribunal found that the CIRP period was expiring on 21 August 2020 and that, under the governing provision, a further 90 days was still available. In these circumstances, exclusion of the entire claimed lockdown period was not warranted, but additional time could be granted within the statutory framework.
Conclusion: The prayer for exemption of 160 days was declined, and further 90 days was granted to complete the CIRP.
Final Conclusion: The application was disposed of by granting limited extension of time for completion of the insolvency resolution process, while refusing the broader exclusion sought for the lockdown period.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute already permits a further period of extension, a blanket exclusion of the claimed lockdown duration need not be granted if limited statutory extension adequately addresses completion of the CIRP.