Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest under Section 24(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be levied on the assessee when the additional sales tax and surcharge were paid promptly on demand after reopening of assessment.
Analysis: The liability to pay additional sales tax and surcharge arose only after the Supreme Court changed the position regarding the nature of the goods, while the relevant transactions had already concluded during the earlier assessment year. The assessee did not resist the reopened assessment and complied with the demand immediately. Section 24(3) contemplates interest on amounts remaining unpaid after the time specified for payment, and the provision was applied in light of the earlier reasoning that interest is not attracted where the demand raised by assessment is satisfied within the legally relevant time and there is no default in complying with the assessment order. The existence of a waiver granted to similarly placed dealers also supported the conclusion that fastening interest in these circumstances would be inequitable.
Conclusion: The demand for interest was unsustainable and was quashed; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest under the sales tax payment provision is not leviable where the assessee promptly complies with the reopened assessment demand and there is no default in payment after the assessment order.