Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee, having opted for SSI exemption under Notification No. 09/2002, loses the benefit of the notification for the entire period merely because in some clearances full tariff duty was paid, and whether refund of the differential duty is barred.
Analysis: The appellants had opted for the exemption notification and were required to pay duty at the concessional rate. Payment of tariff rate duty on a few clearances, by itself, did not show any withdrawal from the notification, particularly when there was no letter or other material evidencing an opt-out. The aberration in some clearances could not justify denial of the notification benefit for the whole period. Since the differential duty had been paid after clearance, the question of unjust enrichment did not arise.
Conclusion: The benefit of the SSI notification could not be denied for the entire period, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the differential duty.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee retained the exemption benefit, with refund-related relief flowing from the finding that there was no valid opting out of the notification.
Ratio Decidendi: Mere payment of higher duty on some clearances does not amount to opting out of an exemption notification or forfeit its benefit for the entire period in the absence of a clear withdrawal from the option.