Tribunal Approves Resolution Plan for Tri-County Premier Hearing Services Inc., Binding Stakeholders

The Tribunal approved the final/revised Resolution Plan submitted by Tri-county Premier Hearing Services Inc., making it binding on all stakeholders involved. The plan was approved with modifications, addressing compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, financing methods, stakeholders' interests, appointment of a Monitoring Agency, and withdrawal of the liquidation application. The Resolution Applicant's sought reliefs were rejected, and the plan's implementation was supervised. The Tribunal concluded by approving the plan under section 31(1) of the IBC, with modifications, and directed the transfer of records to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the final/revised Resolution Plan.
2. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
3. Rejection of the initial Resolution Plan and subsequent liquidation application.
4. Revised Resolution Plan consideration and approval by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).
5. Compliance with Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
6. Mode of financing and stakeholders' interests.
7. Reliefs and exemptions sought by the Resolution Applicant (RA).
8. Appointment and role of Monitoring Agency.
9. Withdrawal of liquidation application.
10. Binding nature and implementation of the Resolution Plan.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the final/revised Resolution Plan:
The application M.A. 1352/2018 was filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) seeking approval for the final/revised Resolution Plan dated 05.11.2018 submitted by Tri-county Premier Hearing Services Inc. The Tribunal approved the plan with modifications, making it binding on all stakeholders involved.

2. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP):
The CIRP was initiated against BSR Diagnostic Limited upon a petition filed by Axis Bank Limited under section 7 of the IBC. The Tribunal admitted the petition on 29.09.2017. The RP was appointed, and the CIRP period was extended by an additional 90 days.

3. Rejection of the initial Resolution Plan and subsequent liquidation application:
The initial Resolution Plan submitted by Tri-county Premier Hearing Services Inc. was rejected due to lack of requisite majority in the CoC meeting. Consequently, the RP filed an application for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, which was opposed by the RA and the suspended Promotor/Director.

4. Revised Resolution Plan consideration and approval by the CoC:
State Bank of India, a significant financial creditor, initially voted against the plan but later accepted the revised offer. The final revised plan was approved by the CoC with a 99.4758% majority.

5. Compliance with Section 30(2) of the IBC:
The RP confirmed that the final resolution plan complied with Section 30(2) of the IBC, addressing the payment of insolvency resolution process costs, debts of operational creditors, management of the Corporate Debtor, and implementation and supervision of the plan.

6. Mode of financing and stakeholders' interests:
The plan proposed various modes of financing, including equity infusion, long-term loans, and internal accruals. The interests of different stakeholders, such as secured and unsecured financial creditors, operational creditors, government dues, and workmen/employees, were addressed with specific payment methodologies.

7. Reliefs and exemptions sought by the RA:
The RA sought several reliefs and exemptions, including immunity from actions and penalties under various laws and exemptions from certain Income Tax provisions. The Tribunal rejected these reliefs, stating that such liabilities are commercial risks that the RA must undertake.

8. Appointment and role of Monitoring Agency:
The plan proposed the appointment of a Monitoring Agency within 30 business days to supervise the implementation of the resolution plan. The Tribunal directed the composition of the Monitoring Agency and allowed the RA to substitute it with prior approval if necessary.

9. Withdrawal of liquidation application:
Considering the approval of the final resolution plan, the RP filed an application for the withdrawal of the liquidation application, which was allowed by the Tribunal.

10. Binding nature and implementation of the Resolution Plan:
The Tribunal approved the resolution plan with modifications, making it binding on the Corporate Debtor and all stakeholders. The moratorium order ceased to have effect, and the RP was directed to forward all records to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

The Tribunal concluded by approving the resolution plan under section 31(1) of the IBC, with modifications, and disposed of all related applications accordingly.

---