Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance of employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI could be made while processing the return under section 143(1), and whether such contribution was deductible when paid before the due date for filing the return.
Analysis: The return was processed only under section 143(1), without scrutiny assessment. An adjustment under that provision cannot extend to a debatable issue requiring verification. The record showed that the employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI had been paid before the due date for furnishing the return. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that such contributions, when paid before the return-filing due date, are allowable and that the adjustment made at the processing stage was beyond the permissible scope of section 143(1).
Conclusion: The disallowance was unsustainable, and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.