Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 deserved to be allowed for reference of the proposed question of law.
Analysis: The application concerned a dispute over entitlement to Modvat credit on capital goods used in the manufacture of dutiable and exempted final products. On a perusal of the record and the Tribunal's order, the Court found that the proposed question whether the capital goods were exclusively used in the manufacture of exempted final products, so as to attract Rule 57R of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, gave rise to a question of law fit for reference.
Conclusion: The reference application was allowed and the Tribunal was directed to refer the framed question to the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the record discloses a live question of law arising from the Tribunal's order, the reference application under Section 35H(1) is to be allowed and the question referred for decision.