Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an auction purchaser of property sold by the State Financial Corporation under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 can be fastened with the commercial tax arrears of the erstwhile owner.
Analysis: The property was sold by the State Financial Corporation in exercise of statutory powers under Section 29, and the purchaser acquired only the property rights sold through auction, not the entire business of the previous owner. Under Section 29(2), the title of the purchaser is to be treated as free from all encumbrances. Section 49 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994 contemplates liability of a transferee only where the entire business is transferred. The purchaser was not a party to the earlier tax liability, there was no privity of contract with the tax department, and no specific statutory provision was shown to permit recovery of the predecessor's dues from the purchaser. The charge, if any, could attach only to the sale proceeds in the hands of the corporation, not to the purchaser's property.
Conclusion: The auction purchaser cannot be made liable for the commercial tax arrears of the erstwhile owner, and recovery from the purchased property was impermissible.
Ratio Decidendi: Property sold by a State Financial Corporation under Section 29(2) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 passes to the auction purchaser free from encumbrances, and in the absence of a specific statutory provision, the purchaser cannot be saddled with the predecessor's tax dues.