Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bank could be restrained from acting on its letter proposing publication of the borrowers' photographs and other details, in the absence of a declaration of wilful default and in the factual setting of pending SARFAESI and civil proceedings.
Analysis: The petitioners had admitted the loan liability, but the material on record did not show a wilful default or mala fide deliberate non-payment of the kind contemplated for coercive publication of photographs. The Court applied the caution expressed in its earlier Division Bench decision that such publication should not be resorted to routinely and may be justified only in special circumstances. The impugned communication was also not treated as a show-cause notice for the purpose of limiting judicial interference. In the circumstances, the pending proceedings did not justify denial of relief against the threatened publication.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to injunctive relief restraining the bank from giving effect to the impugned letter.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the interim protection was confirmed, while the bank's substantive remedies against the company were left open.
Ratio Decidendi: A bank cannot, in the absence of wilful default or special circumstances, resort to publication of a borrower's photograph and similar coercive measures where such action would infringe the borrower's right to dignity.