Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the corporate debtor was liable to be ordered into liquidation and a liquidator appointed. (ii) Whether the claim filed by the other applicant was to be considered during liquidation.
Issue (i): Whether the corporate debtor was liable to be ordered into liquidation and a liquidator appointed.
Analysis: The corporate debtor had already been admitted into corporate insolvency resolution process, repeated extensions for expression of interest did not yield any concrete resolution proposal, and the committee of creditors had approved liquidation with the requisite majority. In these circumstances, liquidation was found to be the appropriate course, and the resolution professional was appointed as liquidator in terms of the Code.
Conclusion: The corporate debtor was ordered to be liquidated and the resolution professional was appointed as liquidator.
Issue (ii): Whether the claim filed by the other applicant was to be considered during liquidation.
Analysis: Since liquidation was directed, the request for direct admission of the claim was not granted as such; instead, the claim was to be examined by the liquidator in accordance with the applicable rules and liquidation process.
Conclusion: The claim was directed to be considered by the liquidator.
Final Conclusion: The proceedings resulted in liquidation of the corporate debtor, cessation of the moratorium, and continuation of all further claims and actions through the liquidation framework under the Code.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the committee of creditors has approved liquidation and no viable resolution plan emerges despite repeated opportunities, the adjudicating authority may order liquidation and appoint a liquidator under the insolvency framework.