TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT grants deduction to credit co-op society under sec 80P</h1> <h3>Shri Mathaji Vividoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niyamitha Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (2) (1) Bangalore.</h3> Shri Mathaji Vividoddesha Souharda Sahakari Niyamitha Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward 2 (2) (1) Bangalore. - TMI Issues Involved:- Denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act- Levying of interest under section 234B and 234C of the ActAnalysis:Issue 1: Denial of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax ActThe appellant, a credit co-operative society, filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order confirming the Assessing Officer's disallowance of deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, amounting to Rs. 25,10,956. The Assessing Officer contended that the appellant, though registered under the Karnataka Souhardha Sahakari Act, 1997, was not entitled to the deduction as it was considered a co-operative bank, not a co-operative society. However, the appellant argued that based on the judgment of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in a similar case, entities registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, should be recognized as co-operative societies. The ITAT, relying on the High Court judgment, held that the appellant was indeed a co-operative society and should be allowed the deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination, except for the issue already decided.Issue 2: Levying of interest under section 234B and 234C of the ActThe Assessing Officer also levied interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Act, which the appellant contested. However, the ITAT's decision focused primarily on the denial of the deduction under section 80P, and no specific ruling or analysis was provided regarding the interest levied. The ITAT's order allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, indicating that the primary issue of deduction under section 80P was the main focus of the judgment, while the interest levied was not extensively discussed.In conclusion, the ITAT's judgment primarily addressed the denial of the deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the classification of the appellant as a co-operative society under the Karnataka Souhardha Sahakari Act, 1997. The decision provided a detailed analysis based on relevant legal precedents and directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the deduction claim in accordance with the law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
