TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Respondents warned for non-compliance in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process</h1> <h3>Ashapura Perfoclay Ltd. Versus Mahabir Techno Ltd.</h3> Ashapura Perfoclay Ltd. Versus Mahabir Techno Ltd. - TMI Issues: Non-cooperation of suspended Board of Directors in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Failure to provide necessary information and documents, Violation of directions issued by NCLAT, Contempt of Courts Act, Compliance with ordersIn the judgment delivered by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, the Resolution Professional of Mahabir Techno Ltd. filed an application against respondent Nos. 1 to 5, seeking cooperation and assistance in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal noted that the respondents were not extending their cooperation, withholding information, and failing to provide the necessary books and documents belonging to the corporate debtor, which they were supposed to maintain. This behavior was deemed as misconduct during the insolvency process.The Tribunal referred to a judgment by the Hon'ble NCLAT in Ajay Kumar vs. Shree Sai Industries Pvt. Ltd., which highlighted the importance of promoters cooperating and handing over necessary documents and information to the Resolution Professional. The judgment emphasized that if necessary, criminal action could be taken against non-cooperating promoters. Additionally, directions were issued during the admission of the Corporate Petition, instructing the Corporate Debtor, its Directors, and personnel to extend full cooperation to the Resolution Professional in managing the affairs of the company.The respondents were found to be in violation of these directions, potentially leading to proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. However, to provide a final opportunity, the Tribunal directed the Resolution Professional to issue a fresh notice to the respondents, specifying the outstanding information, books, and assets to be furnished within three weeks. Failure to comply within the specified time would result in appropriate orders being passed. The Resolution Professional was instructed to file a compliance affidavit before the next hearing, detailing the information provided by the respondents. The case was listed for further proceedings on 15.11.2019, with a copy of the order to be communicated to all parties involved.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
