Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transponder fees paid to the non-resident recipient were chargeable to tax in India so as to require deduction of tax at source under section 195.
Analysis: The payment was examined in the light of the principle that the payer's obligation under section 195 arises only when the remittance contains an element of income that is chargeable to tax under the Act in the hands of the recipient. Since the recipient's similar receipts had already been held by the Delhi High Court to be not chargeable to tax in India, the remittance in question could not attract a withholding obligation merely because it was made to a non-resident. Once the underlying income was found to be outside the tax net in the hands of the recipient, the payer could not be fastened with a duty to deduct tax at source on that payment.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue; no tax was deductible at source on the transponder fee payments.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded on the additional ground, and the remaining grounds became academic and were not adjudicated.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 195 applies only to sums chargeable to tax in the hands of the recipient, and if the underlying payment is not so chargeable, no obligation to deduct tax at source arises.