Dismissal of Appeal Over Debt Threshold: Appellate Tribunal Upholds NCLT Decision

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the NCLT, Allahabad Bench's decision to dismiss an application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The dispute centered around the retrospective application of a notification raising the debt threshold from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 1 crore for such applications. The Tribunal held that the notification clearly established the threshold limit for debts at Rs. 1 crore for applications filed after 24.3.2020. As the application was filed on 13.9.2020, the higher threshold applied, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
- Application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 dismissed by NCLT, Allahabad Bench.
- Dispute regarding the application of notification S.O 1205(E) dated 24.3.2020.
- Retrospective application of the notification.
- Interpretation of Section 4 of the IBC.
- Applicability of the threshold limit for debt in default.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal considered an appeal where the Adjudicating Authority had dismissed the application filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Operational Creditor had claimed that the Corporate Debtor owed a debt since 27.5.2018. However, the Adjudicating Authority dismissed the application citing notification S.O 1205(E) dated 24.3.2020, which raised the threshold limit of debt from Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 1 crore for applications under section 7 or section 9.

The Operational Creditor argued that the notification could not be applied retrospectively and relied on a judgment by NCLAT to support this claim. They contended that since the debt was payable on the date of filing the application, i.e., 13.9.2020, the debt in default related to a period before the issuance of the notification. The Appellant cited judgments by NCLAT and the Apex Court to support their argument against the retrospective application of the notification.

The Tribunal examined Section 4 of the IBC, which specifies the minimum amount of default for insolvency proceedings. The notification dated 24.3.2020 raised the threshold limit to Rs. 1 crore for applications under section 7 or section 9. The Tribunal also analyzed the judgment in Madhusudan Tantia case to distinguish the facts and applicability of the threshold limit in the present case.

Considering the arguments presented and the legal provisions, the Tribunal concluded that the notification clearly set the threshold limit for debt at Rs. 1 crore for applications filed on or after 24.3.2020. Since the application under section 9 was filed on 13.9.2020, the threshold limit of Rs. 1 crore was applicable. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal at the admission stage, finding no reason to admit it based on the presented reasons and legal interpretations.

---