Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were wrongly discharged at the stage of framing of charge by assessing the material in isolation and by relying upon letters not forming part of the police report record.
Analysis: At the stage of framing of charge, the court must assess whether the record discloses a prima facie case on an overall consideration of the materials collected during investigation. The respondents' alleged omission to perform mandatory duties could not be evaluated in isolation, and the court below erred in treating the matter as mere negligence. The court below also wrongly relied upon letters said to have been written by one respondent because, in a case based on a police report, the court must confine itself to the documents referred to under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and could not rely on documents whose authenticity and veracity had not been examined.
Conclusion: The discharge was unsustainable and the matter had to be reconsidered afresh on the basis of the proper record.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stage of framing of charge in a case instituted on a police report, the court must confine itself to the material forming part of the police report record and determine prima facie involvement on an overall appreciation of the investigation materials, without relying on extraneous documents.