Criminal misconduct under corruption law not made out where official duties and absence of dishonest intent negate abuse of position.

Materials collected in investigation did not disclose the ingredients of criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The alleged foreign travel of accompanying persons at public expense was not shown to involve corrupt or illegal means, abuse of position, or obtaining a pecuniary advantage without public interest, because the record indicated that the accused remained on official duties and the accompanying persons assisted those duties. Mere departure from departmental norms, without dishonest intention, was insufficient. The prosecution was therefore held to be an abuse of process, and the criminal proceedings were quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the materials collected during investigation disclosed the ingredients of criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 so as to justify continuance of the prosecution, and whether the proceedings were liable to be quashed as an abuse of process.

Analysis: The prosecution allegation was that the accused, while serving as a public servant, caused certain persons to accompany him to London at the expense of public sector undertakings, without any pending business there. The materials, however, showed that the accused remained engaged in official duties during the relevant period and that the accompanying persons assisted him in discharging those duties. On that factual foundation, the essential elements of Section 13(1)(d), namely corrupt or illegal means, abuse of position, or obtaining a pecuniary advantage without public interest, were not established. Mere impropriety or departure from departmental norms, even if assumed, did not by itself amount to criminal misconduct in the absence of dishonest intention.

Conclusion: The prosecution did not disclose the offence alleged and its continuation was an abuse of the process of court; the impugned orders were set aside and the criminal proceedings were quashed.

---