Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-revision notices proposing ad hoc reversal of input tax credit, issued on the basis of an Enforcement Wing proposal without first calling for and examining the assessee's records in the light of the departmental circular dated 04.11.2013, were sustainable in law.
Analysis: The Assessing Officer functions as an independent authority and is required to complete the assessment on the basis of the books of account and returns after giving the assessee an opportunity. An Enforcement Wing proposal is only a trigger for further scrutiny and is not binding. Where the department suspected accumulation of input tax credit, the proper course was to require production of records, examine whether the sale price was below the purchase price, and then form a prima facie view before proceeding further. The circular dated 04.11.2013 governed the manner in which the proposal had to be dealt with by the Assessing Officer, and the instruction was binding on the departmental authority.
Conclusion: The pre-revision notices were unsustainable. The writ appeals were allowed, the notices were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh action in accordance with the circular and after examination of the records.