Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether modvat credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was admissible on conveyor system, automatic testing machines/measuring instruments, conductive plastic racks and overhead bridge as capital goods for the period prior to the amendment by Notification No. 11/95 dated 16.03.1995.
Analysis: The disputed items had already been recognised in Tribunal decisions as eligible capital goods where they were integral to the manufacturing process. Conveyor belts were treated as eligible capital goods, testing machines were held admissible, measuring devices used for quantification of raw material were accepted as capital goods, and overhead bridge, being part of the conveyor system, followed the same treatment. Conductive plastic racks were also treated as storing devices fitted with the conveyor system. The amendment by Notification No. 11/95 did not narrow the earlier scope of the expression capital goods so as to exclude the disputed items.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible on all the disputed items and the Revenue appeal was rejected.