1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appellate Tribunal affirms Commissioner's decision on capital goods classification in revenue appeals.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI upheld the Commissioner's decision in two revenue appeals, determining certain items as capital goods based on ... - The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI heard two revenue appeals against different assessees regarding the classification of certain items as capital goods. In both cases, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision that the items in question qualified as capital goods based on the definition and case law. The Tribunal referred to a Larger Bench judgment and the decision of the Apex Court, confirming that if an item plays a role in the manufacture of the final product as an accessory or component, it qualifies as a capital good. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected both revenue appeals, affirming the Commissioner's orders.