Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the block assessment order should be set aside and the pending appeals remitted for fresh consideration in the light of retrospective amendments, with interim protection against recovery.
Analysis: The block assessment order was set aside and the appeal against that order was directed to be heard afresh by the Tribunal, with liberty to raise all contentions available in law and with a direction that the Tribunal would not be influenced by earlier observations. The Tribunal was also required to take into consideration retrospective amendments made in 2002. Similarly, the appeal against the regular assessment order was remitted to the CIT(A) for disposal on the same footing, again taking into account the retrospective amendments. The Department was restrained from taking coercive recovery action up to the specified date.
Conclusion: The assessee obtained setting aside of the block assessment and remand of both matters for fresh adjudication, along with temporary protection against recovery.
Final Conclusion: The dispute was finally disposed of by remitting the assessment appeals for fresh decision and granting limited interim relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where assessment proceedings are affected by retrospective legislative amendments, pending appeals may be remitted for fresh consideration with liberty to urge all legal contentions and with interim protection against coercive recovery.