TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Proprietor convicted for dishonored cheque, sentence reduced on appeal, emphasizes evidence and sentencing</h1> <h3>K.N. Unnikrishnan Versus M. Sivakumar</h3> The accused, proprietor of 'Action Suit,' issued a dishonored cheque to the complainant, a textile business owner, for a loan repayment. The trial court ... - Issues involved: Criminal Revision against conviction and sentence u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.Issue 1: Business transaction and issuance of dishonored chequeThe complainant, a textile business owner, received a dishonored cheque from the accused, the proprietor of 'Action Suit,' to repay a loan. The cheque was endorsed to the complainant by a third party. The complainant filed a complaint u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court examined witnesses and documents to establish the business transaction and dishonored cheque.Issue 2: Examination of witnesses and documentary evidenceWitnesses testified to the business dealings and the dishonored cheque. Documents including power of attorney, cheques, notices, and bank statements were presented as evidence. The accused pleaded not guilty, challenging the complainant's status as a holder in due course.Issue 3: Conviction and appealThe trial court found the accused guilty u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, sentencing imprisonment and a fine. The accused appealed, arguing lack of due course holder status and pending civil suit. The appellate judge upheld the conviction based on evidence and dismissed the appeal.Issue 4: Revision and modification of sentenceThe accused filed a revision challenging the appellate judgment. The court reduced the sentence from one year to six months of imprisonment and ordered the accused to compensate the complainant with the cheque amount. The accused was directed to pay the compensation or face judicial custody.This judgment highlights the legal proceedings and considerations in a case involving a dishonored cheque and business transactions, emphasizing the importance of evidence, legal rights, and appropriate sentencing in matters u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
