NCLAT rejects review application, emphasizes no shown mistake, re-agitated issues addressed. Absence of provision for review highlighted. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi rejected an application for review of a previous judgement, emphasizing that no mistake was shown ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
NCLAT rejects review application, emphasizes no shown mistake, re-agitated issues addressed. Absence of provision for review highlighted.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi rejected an application for review of a previous judgement, emphasizing that no mistake was shown and re-agitated issues had already been addressed. The Tribunal highlighted the absence of a provision for review under the procedures and that NCLAT Rules Section 11 does not confer power to review a judgement without legislative authorization.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi rejected an application for review of a previous judgement, stating that no mistake apparent from the record was shown and re-agitated issues had already been addressed in previous proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized that there is no provision for review under the procedures and that Section 11 of NCLAT Rules cannot create power to review a judgement without legislative conferment of such power. The application was rejected.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
