Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the conviction under the cheque dishonour provision could be quashed in revision on the basis of a genuine compromise between the parties and by permitting compounding of the offence.
Analysis: The compromise was accepted as voluntary, without threat or undue influence, and supported by independent witnesses. The offence under the cheque dishonour provision was treated as having a compensatory character, with precedence to restitution over punishment. In revisional jurisdiction, the Court could give effect to a bona fide compromise and secure the ends of justice by permitting compounding, consistent with the governing legal position.
Conclusion: The conviction and sentence were quashed and the revision petition was allowed, subject to deposit of 15% of the cheque amount with the State Legal Services Authority.
Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide compromise in a cheque dishonour case may be acted upon in revisional proceedings to permit compounding and quash the conviction, as the offence is predominantly compensatory in nature.