Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could exercise its inherent jurisdiction to direct return of the petitioner's passport notwithstanding the bar against review or alteration of a signed judgment.
Analysis: Section 362 of the Code prohibits review or alteration of a signed judgment except to correct clerical errors, but that restriction does not curtail the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code. Those powers may be used to give effect to orders under the Code or to secure the ends of justice. The petitioner's undertaking to appear for interrogation, return within a fixed period, furnish enhanced bail bonds, and supply itinerary details addressed the apprehension that he might not be available during the investigation.
Conclusion: The petition was maintainable and the High Court could direct return of the passport in exercise of its inherent powers; the relief was granted in favour of the petitioner.
Final Conclusion: The order recognizes that the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court is not defeated by the limitation on review contained in Section 362, and it permits release of the passport subject to compliance with the directed safeguards.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 362 does not restrict the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482, and those powers may be exercised to secure the ends of justice despite a prior order of the trial court.