Supreme Court of India Approves Revised BCCI Constitution: Emphasizes Professionalism, Transparency, and Governance

The Supreme Court of India approved the draft constitution of BCCI with modifications, emphasizing professional management, transparency, and a balance of authority. The court restored full membership to historically significant cricket associations, increased the number of selectors, modified the cooling off period, and outlined clear disqualifications for office bearers. State associations must align their constitutions with the BCCI constitution, and the CoA is empowered to ensure compliance and submit further reports for future directions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Issues relating to membership and Associate Membership
2. Number of members in Selection Committee and related matters
3. Cooling off period
4. Disqualifications
5. Constitution of the Apex Council
6. Conditions imposed on State Associations
7. Power/Duties of Office Bearers and Professional Management (CEO)
8. No interference at all in the functioning of BCCI
9. Binding value of Frequently Asked Questions issued by the Hon’ble Justice Lodha committee

Detailed Analysis:

A. Issues relating to membership and Associate Membership: One State – One Vote
The draft constitution of BCCI proposed that each state shall have one full member, and no state shall have more than one full member. Historically, states like Maharashtra and Gujarat have multiple associations (e.g., Mumbai, Maharashtra, Vidarbha in Maharashtra; Gujarat, Baroda, Saurashtra in Gujarat) contributing significantly to cricket. The court acknowledged their contributions and restored full membership to these associations. Railways, Services, and the Association of Indian Universities were also granted full membership due to their significant contributions to cricket, with the stipulation that representatives must be former cricketers elected by their respective associations.

B. Number of Selectors
The Lodha Committee recommended a three-member selection committee, but the court increased this to five due to the vastness of the country and the extensive travel required to spot talent. The criteria for selectors include having played a minimum of seven Test matches, thirty first-class matches, or ten One Day Internationals and twenty first-class matches. The court accepted the amendments suggested by the amicus curiae regarding the composition and responsibilities of the selection committees for men, women, and junior cricket.

C. Cooling Off Period
The Lodha Committee recommended a three-year term for office bearers with a mandatory cooling off period after each term. The court modified this to allow an office bearer to serve two consecutive terms (six years) before a cooling off period of three years is required. This aims to prevent the concentration of power and ensure a dispersal of authority, while still allowing experienced individuals to contribute effectively.

D. Disqualifications
The court accepted the disqualifications proposed in the draft constitution with modifications suggested by the amicus curiae. Disqualifications include not being a citizen of India, being over 70 years old, being insolvent or of unsound mind, being a minister or government servant, holding office in another sports association, having served as an office bearer for nine years, and being charged with a criminal offense.

E. Constitution of the Apex Council
The court approved the functional distinction between the General Body and the Apex Council, emphasizing professional management through the CEO and other officers. The Apex Council, consisting of nine members, is responsible for the administration of BCCI, ensuring strategic guidance, efficient management, and a balance of authority.

F. Conditions Imposed on State Associations
The court directed that state associations must register their constitutions in line with the BCCI constitution within 30 days of its registration. Compliance certificates must be furnished to the Committee of Administrators (CoA), which will file a status report before the court.

G. Power/Duties of Office Bearers and Professional Management (CEO)
The court emphasized the need for professional management of BCCI, with the CEO and other officers recruited transparently. The responsibilities and powers of the CEO and other managers are clearly delineated to ensure efficient administration.

H. No Interference at All in the Functioning of BCCI
The court reiterated that the functioning of BCCI should be free from interference, ensuring that the administration and management are conducted professionally and transparently.

I. Binding Value of Frequently Asked Questions Issued by the Hon’ble Justice Lodha Committee
The court upheld the binding value of the FAQs issued by the Lodha Committee, ensuring that the recommendations and guidelines provided are followed meticulously.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court of India approved the draft constitution of BCCI with modifications, emphasizing professional management, transparency, and a balance of authority. The court restored full membership to historically significant cricket associations, increased the number of selectors, modified the cooling off period, and outlined clear disqualifications for office bearers. State associations must align their constitutions with the BCCI constitution, and the CoA is empowered to ensure compliance and submit further reports for future directions.

---