Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after payment of the insured amount to depositors of an insured bank under the deposit insurance scheme, the Official Liquidator was bound to repay the available surplus to the Corporation in priority, rather than distribute it further among depositors.
Analysis: The statutory scheme contemplated insurance of deposits only up to the prescribed ceiling for each depositor, with the Official Liquidator required to furnish deposit details and the Corporation to discharge its liability to that extent. Section 21 created a clear repayment mechanism in favour of the Corporation, and sub-section (2) operated notwithstanding anything contrary in any other law. Regulation 22 further required repayment to the Corporation out of realisations in the hands of the liquidator after making provision for liquidation expenses and dividend. The Court held that once the insured amount had been paid, any further available amount could not be directed to be distributed to depositors in disregard of this statutory mandate.
Conclusion: The direction of the High Court was unsustainable, and the available amount had to be dealt with in accordance with the statutory repayment priority in favour of the Corporation.