Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payment of 10% of the value of exempted clearances under Rule 6(3)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules was required where the same goods were cleared both on payment of duty and under exemption, and whether refund of such amount was admissible.
Analysis: Rule 6 applies where excisable goods are cleared both on payment of duty and under exemption and common inputs are used in the manufacture of such clearances. The liability under Rule 6(3)(a) is not confined to situations involving two different types of goods; it is attracted by the nature of the clearances, namely dutiable and exempted. On that basis, the amount equal to 10% of the value of the exempted goods was correctly paid.
Conclusion: The payment made by the appellant was in accordance with Rule 6(3)(a), and no refund was due. The appeal failed.