Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court's orders granting bail to the accused in a murder and conspiracy case called for interference on the ground of non-application of mind, inadequacy of the prima facie assessment, seriousness of the offence, and the accused's criminal antecedents.
Analysis: The appeals arose from orders granting bail in a case involving offences under the Penal Code and statements recorded during investigation implicating the accused. The governing test for interference with a bail order is whether the court granting bail acted without application of mind or whether the reasons for bail are unsupported by the prima facie material on record. The mere gravity of the accusation and the existence of other criminal cases, by themselves, are not enough to deny bail if the High Court has considered the relevant materials and exercised discretion on a permissible view of the evidence. On the facts, the High Court had taken into account the FIR, witness statements, and the circumstances placed before it, and no ex facie error or improper exercise of discretion was shown.
Conclusion: The High Court's orders granting bail did not suffer from legal infirmity warranting interference, and the appeals were dismissed.