TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Validity of 1915 Wakfnama Upheld: Conversion Claim Rejected, Deed Found Valid</h1> <h3>Zafrul Hasan and Ors. Versus Farid Ud-Din and Ors.</h3> Zafrul Hasan and Ors. Versus Farid Ud-Din and Ors. - TMI Issues: Validity of a wakfnama dated 28-6-1915 challenged on grounds of being fictitious and colorable, and settlor's change in faith from Sunni to Shia before execution.Analysis:1. The primary issue in this case revolves around the validity and operativeness of a wakfnama executed by Chaudri Salah Uddin on 28-6-1915. The appellants contested the validity of the deed, alleging it to be fictitious and colorable, aimed at evading debt payments. Additionally, they argued that the settlor, who was initially a Sunni, had converted to Shia before executing the wakfnama, which could impact its validity under the Mussalman Wakf Validating Act VI of 1913.2. The contention regarding the settlor's conversion from Sunni to Shia before executing the wakfnama was refuted by the High Court. The Act allowed Hanafi Mussalmans to include provisions for personal maintenance and debt payment in a wakf, but this provision did not extend to Shias. The District Judge initially found the settlor to be Shia, but the High Court reversed this based on documentary evidence indicating the settlor's Sunni affiliation until 1919. The oral evidence presented in 1928 and 1929 was deemed inconclusive. The burden lay on the appellants to prove the settlor's conversion, which they failed to do convincingly.3. The second contention focused on the wakfnama being fictitious and colorable to avoid debt payments. The Transfer of Property Act sections were referenced, with the appellants failing to demonstrate that any interested parties acquired their interests during the dispute, thereby limiting their recourse under the Act. The wakfnama, until voided, remained valid and binding. The appellants' claim that the deed was fictitious was dismissed due to lack of substantial evidence supporting such a contention.4. The settlor's indebtedness at the time of executing the wakfnama was a crucial aspect of the case. The District Judge considered mortgage and dower debts, while the High Court excluded secured debts from the assessment. The High Court determined that dower debts were deferred, not prompt, based on documentary evidence. Moreover, actions taken by the settlor's wives post the wakfnama's execution indicated acceptance and validation of the deed, undermining claims of its fictitious nature.5. The evidence regarding the settlor's unsecured debts amounting to &8377;40,000 was deemed vague and insufficient by the High Court, concurring with the District Judge's assessment. The registration and mutation of the wakfnama were duly completed, further solidifying its validity. The High Court's findings were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the High Court's decree.
TaxTMI 