Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a case involving allegations of cheating, criminal breach of trust and criminal conspiracy.
Analysis: The charges had crystallised to offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, the investigation was complete, the challan had been presented and charges had been framed. The petitioner had remained in custody for more than 11 months, the offence was triable by the Magistrate and no prosecution witness had yet been examined. The Court also noted that the complainants had already pursued recovery proceedings as operational creditors in insolvency proceedings, and that continued incarceration was not shown to be necessary for any further investigative purpose. Applying the settled principles that bail is to secure attendance at trial and that pre-trial detention is not to be used punitively, the Court found the case fit for release on bail.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to regular bail.