TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court orders surrender within 10 days for anticipatory bail petition in money laundering case.</h1> <h3>Satpal Rana Versus Uma Nand Vijay Assistant Director Enforcement Directorate</h3> Satpal Rana Versus Uma Nand Vijay Assistant Director Enforcement Directorate - TMI Issues:1. Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for an offense under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.Analysis:The petitioner filed a petition seeking anticipatory bail in a criminal complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The case is intertwined with another case involving a co-accused who was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The main accused in the corruption case had his non-bailable warrants converted to bailable warrants by the Court, and his property was attached. The supplementary complaint was filed against the petitioner, alleging that the petitioner's property was purchased with money accumulated by the convicted co-accused.The defense argued that the petitioner is willing to surrender and face trial. The State counsel opposed the petition. The Court, considering the circumstances, disposed of the petition with a direction that if the petitioner surrenders within ten days, they will be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial Court. This judgment highlights the interconnected nature of cases involving multiple accused individuals and the legal implications of property attachment in cases of financial offenses like money laundering.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
