Tribunal Limits Disallowance to Rs. 15 Lakhs, Upholds Interest Expense Deletion

The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, limiting the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 15 lakhs. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of interest expenses disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) but directed a lumpsum disallowance of Rs. 15 lakhs from general expenditure under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The cross objection of the assessee was dismissed due to filing delay and absence of a condonation petition.

---

---

Issues: Disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Issue 1: Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Act
The appeal and cross objection were against the disallowance made under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in property development, received share income and dividends claimed as exempt without making any disallowance under section 14A. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) computed disallowance under Rule 8D, resulting in interest and expenses disallowance totaling Rs. 1,51,37,386. The assessee contended before the CIT(A) that no disallowance was necessary as no expenditure was incurred to earn exempt income. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's contentions, directing the A.O. to delete the disallowance. The revenue challenged this decision.

Issue 2: Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Act
The Tribunal noted the own funds available with the assessee exceeded the value of investments, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Micro Labs Ltd. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the interest expenses disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the IT Rules.

Issue 3: Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Act
Regarding the disallowance out of expenditure under Rule 8D(2)(iii), the CIT(A) deleted the disallowance based on the assessee's cross-charging of expenses to partnership firms. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the cross-charging represented services availed by the partnership firms from the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need to segregate expenses related to taxable and exempt income under section 14A, directing a lumpsum disallowance of Rs. 15 lakhs from general expenditure.

Issue 4: Cross Objection
The assessee filed a cross objection belatedly, seeking a reasonable disallowance under section 14A. However, the Tribunal dismissed the cross objection due to the delay in filing and the absence of a petition for condonation.

In conclusion, the appeal by the revenue was partly allowed, restricting the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 15 lakhs, and the cross objection of the assessee was dismissed. The Tribunal's decision was pronounced on 28th June 2021.

---