Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court Appoints Joint Administrator for Deceased's Shareholding</h1> <h3>Priyambada Debi Birla Versus Ajoy Kumar Newar and Ors.</h3> The court appointed a Joint Administrator pendente lite comprising four individuals to oversee the deceased's shareholding in all companies, conduct ... - Issues Involved:1. Appointment of Administrator pendente lite (APL)2. Validity and genuineness of the Will and Codicil3. Allegations of undue influence and suspicious circumstances4. Necessity and grounds for appointing an APL5. Conduct and credibility of the executor6. Legal principles and precedents for appointing an APLIssue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Appointment of Administrator pendente lite (APL):The applications for appointing an APL were filed by the defendants, challenging the executor's control over the estate. The court considered the vastness of the estate and the serious challenge to the Will and the executor's appointment. The court concluded that the estate was in 'medio,' meaning there was no legal representation of the estate, necessitating the appointment of an APL to manage and control the estate during the pendency of the probate proceedings.2. Validity and genuineness of the Will and Codicil:The defendants challenged the Will and Codicil, alleging they were manufactured and procured documents. They argued that the disposition was unnatural, excluding family members and giving all properties to the executor, a paid employee. The court noted that the challenge to the Will's genuineness and the executor's appointment was serious and bona fide, warranting careful consideration.3. Allegations of undue influence and suspicious circumstances:The defendants alleged that the executor exercised undue influence over the deceased, who was in poor health and dependent on him. They cited suspicious circumstances, such as the unnatural disposition of the estate, the executor's substantial benefit, and the change of lawyer for preparing the Will. The court found these allegations to be serious and supported by prima facie evidence, making it unsafe to leave the estate in the executor's hands.4. Necessity and grounds for appointing an APL:The court emphasized the necessity of appointing an APL due to the vast and valuable estate, the serious challenge to the Will, and the executor's conduct. The court referred to legal principles and precedents, highlighting that the appointment of an APL is discretionary and should be based on the necessity to protect and preserve the estate. The court found that the executor's actions and the ongoing litigations created a strong case for appointing an APL.5. Conduct and credibility of the executor:The executor's conduct was scrutinized, including his hasty actions to gain control of the companies and his failure to disclose and collect all assets of the deceased. The court noted that the executor was facing criminal prosecution and had acted in a manner that raised doubts about his trustworthiness and competence. The court concluded that the executor's conduct and the allegations against him justified his displacement and the appointment of an APL.6. Legal principles and precedents for appointing an APL:The court referred to various legal principles and precedents, including English and Indian case law, to support its decision. The court highlighted that the appointment of an APL is guided by the principles of necessity, the seriousness of the challenge to the Will, and the need to protect and preserve the estate. The court emphasized that the executor's appointment should be questioned if there are serious allegations and the estate is vast and valuable.Conclusion:The court appointed a Joint Administrator pendente lite consisting of four individuals to take charge and control of the deceased's shareholding in all companies, make necessary inquiries, and manage the estate during the probate proceedings. The executor was directed to hand over all charges to the appointed administrators. The court also granted a conditional stay of the judgment for three weeks, allowing the executor to act as a director or chairman with his own qualifying shareholding, if appointed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found