Custodial interrogation in economic offences can justify refusal of anticipatory bail when effective investigation demands custody.

Anticipatory bail in a suspected foreign exchange violation was refused because the Court accepted that custodial interrogation can be necessary for an effective economic offence investigation. The investigating agency had relied on search material, statements and coded financial records, and the Court held that further questioning in custody was needed to trace the full extent of the alleged offences. It also held that a willingness to cooperate while on bail does not substitute for interrogation in custody, where confrontation with documents and other material is more effective.

---

---

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in aid of an ongoing investigation into alleged Foreign Exchange Regulation Act violations where the investigating agency seeks custodial interrogation of the accused.

Analysis: The application arose in the context of a complex economic investigation involving suspected foreign exchange violations. The Court noted that the Enforcement Directorate had obtained leads from search material, statements, and coded financial records, and that further interrogation of the petitioner was required to trace the full extent of the alleged offences. It accepted that liberty is important and that custodial interrogation has risks, but held that such interrogation is a recognised investigative tool and may be necessary for effective detection and prosecution of economic offences. The Court also found that the petitioner's willingness for interrogation while on bail would not serve the same purpose as interrogation while in custody, since custody enables more effective confrontation with documents and other material.

Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was declined because the need for effective custodial interrogation in the foreign exchange investigation outweighed the request for pre-arrest bail.

Final Conclusion: The petitioner's claim to pre-arrest protection failed in view of the investigative requirements of the enforcement authorities in a suspected economic offence case.

Ratio Decidendi: Where effective investigation of a suspected economic offence requires custodial interrogation, anticipatory bail may be refused notwithstanding the accused's willingness to cooperate while at liberty.

---